|
Electric industry restructuring is coming to the
District of Columbia. The D.C.
Council, with the leadership of committee chair Sharon Ambrose,
adopted the parameters of electricity reform, and the D.C. Public
Service Commission (PSC) authorized the Potomac Electric Power
Company (Pepco) to sell most of its generating plants. What does all
of this mean for consumers?
Generation will be largely deregulated. Consumers will no longer
have to buy electricity generated exclusively by Pepco. They can buy
from anyone they like at market prices. President Clinton projects
$20 billion in savings per year in the United States, as market
efficiencies replace state-by-state regulatory price-setting.
Transmission of power will remain unchanged. Transmission
reliability will continue to be managed by an independent systems
operator that is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and closely monitored by a coalition of states in this
region, including the District. This assures that no generator gains
an advantage in moving electricity over the transmission grid.
Distribution of electricity over the local lines will still be a
regulated monopoly. The PSC will set the prices and design programs
for consumer protection, low-income assistance and energy
efficiency.
Making It Work for Everybody
To ensure that D.C. can continue its
low-income subsidies and make electric power affordable to all, the
D.C. Council provided for a Reliable Energy Trust Fund. To support
the fund, the PSC will require all customers to pay a small
distribution charge of up to $.0008 per unit of electricity starting
in 2002-the equivalent of about 56 cents a month for the average
D.C. resident. The PSC also will be working to lower consumer bills
and protect the environment by promoting energy efficiency and
encouraging the use of renewables such as solar power.
But what about electric rates? What will be the impact of electric
restructuring on your monthly bill? Here's what to expect:
Residential rate payers will receive a guaranteed 7-percent rate
reduction. A 2-percent reduction already is in effect, and an
additional 1.5-percent reduction will take place this July, with the
rest of the reduction coming after Pepco sells its generating
plants.
Commercial rate payers will receive a 6.5-percent rate reduction,
under a similar schedule.
Rates paid by all D.C. Pepco customers will be capped for four years
at the reduced levels.
Lower-income D.C. consumers will have their rates capped for six
years.
D.C. commercial and residential rate payers may receive additional
reductions if the savings on energy purchased by Pepco exceed
agreed-upon levels.
In another piece of possible good news for consumers,
D.C. customers also will receive a
substantial majority (from 60 to 85 percent) of leftover proceeds
from the sale of Pepco's generating plants, if the sale covers
certain agreed-upon costs. Generating facilities have been selling
for well above book value across the country, so some kind of
leftover proceeds is at least possible, if not likely. However, if
the plants are sold below their book value, D.C. consumers will have
to pay for what the industry calls a stranded investment.
Why Restructure?
At a PSC public hearing in D.C.'s
Ward 8 in October 1999, a member of the D.C. Consumer Utility Board
made the point that restructuring meant the dismantlement of the
entire system that has served D.C. well for almost a century that
is, a regulated monopoly which is providing, by and large, a safe,
adequate, reliable supply of electricity to the people who depend on
it. During the many hearings we held on this subject, D.C. residents
regularly cited the District's low electricity rates, minimal
consumer confusion, and freedom from telemarketers as positive
aspects of the present system.
So if the system was not broken, why did we fix it? The answer is
because generation in this region and around the nation is no longer
a natural monopoly. Maryland,
Virginia,
Pennsylvania,
Delaware,
New Jersey, New York and many other
states have adopted the competitive model. Congress is likely to act
nationally as well. As a result, it was important for the D.C.
Council and the PSC to act now and to structure the market
parameters ourselves rather than having Congress or some other
entity impose a less favorable deal on us than the one we achieved.
Edward M. Meyers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-adv/specialsales/energy/report/article8.html |